Vyacheslav Maracha – On the Role of the State and Business in Protecting the Rights of Indigenous Peoples of the North

Key points from the PORA expert presented during a discussion in late May 2026

May 3, 2026

On May 29, 2026, the PORA Expert Center held a discussion club on the topic: «Protecting the Rights of Indigenous Peoples of the North and the Role of the State and Business in This Process.» Vyacheslav Maracha, Associate Professor at the Institute of Social Sciences of RANEPA, at the Financial University, and at the National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, and Vice-President of the National Guild of Professional Consultants, believes that Russia can draw on Norway’s experience in legally recognizing the nomadic way of life as the basis for land rights that protect this way of life. According to the expert, the role of business should be focused on preserving the value-added chain of traditional livelihoods at the local level, while the role of the state should be focused on legislative provision of rights related to traditional livelihoods as well as mobile education.

The Place of the Issue in the Policies of Nordic Countries (Norway, Sweden, Finland) and the Effectiveness of Mechanisms

In the Nordic countries, the issue of supporting Indigenous peoples (especially the Sámi) is at the top of the political agenda but is complex to implement. The key principle is «free, prior, and informed consent» (FPIC). Support measures for Indigenous peoples are effective where business – primarily mining enterprises – is required to enter into legally binding agreements with communities, rather than simply holding consultations.

Three groups of progressive mechanisms can be identified.

First, legal protection of livelihoods: Norway, through judicial precedents (the Selbu case), has recognized the priority of traditional reindeer husbandry over other types of land use, taking the nomadic way of life into account when proving land rights.

Second, co-management of resources through the establishment of the Finnmark Estate, which manages lands with the direct participation of reindeer herders and the Sámi Parliament.

Third, the inclusive nature of education: in Norway, the Sámi Parliament independently determines the content of curricula (including reindeer husbandry and crafts), and students are guaranteed education in their native language even when the group size is small.

Priorities and Current Challenges for Russia

The first priority for Russia is addressing the problem of the «nomadic gap.» The main challenge is the breakdown of the «child – herd – school» connection. Stationary boarding schools separate children from their families, destroying the transmission of knowledge about reindeer herding and traditional livelihoods. The urgent priorities here are the nomadic kindergarten and nomadic school.

With regard to the economy of traditional livelihoods, the current challenge for the state is shifting the priority from survival to development. This requires removing administrative barriers so that quotas for Indigenous small-numbered peoples not only ensure survival but also become economically viable for business.

A current challenge in the development of reindeer herding is digitalization without the loss of traditions. The use of GLONASS and technology should help reindeer herders in monitoring pastures, but it is critically important to preserve the legal status of traditional knowledge when making government decisions.

The Role of Business in Supporting Indigenous Small-Numbered Peoples

In defining the role of business in supporting Indigenous small-numbered peoples, three key principles can be identified.

First: from corporate social responsibility (CSR) to partnership. Today, business (oil and gas extraction, gold mining) often perceives Indigenous small-numbered peoples as an «environmental burden.» The role of business must change: not paying «compensation» but investing in production infrastructure (mobile slaughterhouses, refrigerators at nomadic migration routes).

Second: supporting the traditional way of life through eco-projects. Industrial development of the Arctic inevitably leads to the degradation of pastures and fish migration routes. Genuine protection of rights is when business finances professional retraining of nomads in agriculture without forcing them to become rotational shift workers.

Third: nomadic education as a KPI. An effective support measure from business is the construction and material-technical equipping of modular chum-schools that follow the family, as well as the creation of remote jobs (fish/meat processing operator in the tundra).

The Project Office for Arctic Development and the editorial board of GoArctic.ru do not necessarily share the opinions expressed by experts.

For media representatives: we welcome the republication of comments provided that an active link to the original source is given and the columnist’s status as an expert of the Project Office for Arctic Development is indicated.

Оthers Our comments

Trans-Arctic Transport Corridor May Offer Alternative to European Waterways?

Trans-Arctic Transport Corridor is to facilitate the supply of Russian products to countries in the Global South. This initiative aims to identify and cultivate novel market opportunities for Russia, particularly in light of existing international sanctions.

read more

Why Is Washington Openly Disregarding International Law in the Greenland Issue?

US President Donald Trump has repeatedly and publicly mentioned plans to bring Greenland under US control — “one way or another,” whether through purchase or by force. Why is he pursuing this, and what could it mean for international cooperation in the Arctic? Dr. Andrey Krivorotov, Doctor of Economics, Acting Head of the Department of...

read more
View all
arrow-nebutton-svgcaret-downcartclose-annkiclosecopyfacebook-squarehamburgerinstagram-squareleft-arrowlinkedin-squarelinkedinlong-arrow-leftlong-arrow-rightmailminuspagination-arrow-nextpagination-arrow-prevpauseplayplusrssrutubesearchsharestartelegramtgtriangletwitter-squarevkwhatsapp