Maksim Dankin Supposes the Rise of Two Dominant Powers in the Arctic
February 5, 2026
Why is the world now seriously looking at the North, how has Greenland become a point where the interests of the USA, Europe, Russia, and China converge, and why is melting ice changing not just the map but the very logic of world politics? In early February, Maksim Dankin, General Director of the Project Office for Arctic Development, discussed this with Anatoly Kuzichev in a new episode of his podcast About Us.
«The case related to Greenland could very strongly influence the world order – at least in the Northern Hemisphere. Let’s suppose, hypothetically, Denmark disappears from the composition of Arctic states because it loses Greenland… Then two superpowers will emerge in the Arctic. These will be Russia and the USA. Everyone else, including Sweden, Norway and others, will be the ‘little ones.’ This will completely change the configuration of international dialogue in the Arctic. The Americans will start creating their own rules, and we will have to respond,»
- Dankin noted
The Project Office for Arctic Development does not always share the opinions expressed by experts.
For media representatives: we welcome republication of comments provided that an active link to the original source and the columnist’s status as an expert of the Arctic Development Project Office are indicated.
Authors
Оthers Our comments
China Deepens Economic and Technological Ties with Russia
Dr. Andrey Krivorotov, Doctor of Science (Economics), Acting Head of Innovations Management Department, Odintsovo branch, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of China and Contemporary Asia, Russian Academy of Sciences highlights China’s potential contributions in Arctic cooperation, primarily investment and technology transfer in communications and navigation systems,...
read more
Trump’s Push for Greenland: Implications for Russia-India Arctic Cooperation
The United States has renewed its focus on Greenland. This desire for acquisition by the US is not unprecedented, having been seriously explored by American policymakers in 1867, 1910, 1946 and 1955. Contrary to initial perceptions that US President Donald Trump's interest was merely frivolous, evidence suggests that this could be a firm decision already made by the US Administration, at least under his leadership, one which they could be determined to execute in future.
read more