Inequality of Arctic Regions. Part II: The Redistributive Role of Tax Administration

This study examines how tax administration and subsequent revenue redistribution influence interregional disparities within the Russian Arctic. It demonstrates that the Arctic territories function as a significant contributor to the national budget, with a substantial share of locally collected taxes transferred to the federal level.

While existing tax rules and revenue‑sharing mechanisms mitigate disparities between different Arctic regions within a single fiscal year, they do not produce a sustained reduction of inequality over the medium and long term.

Context

The research continues PORA’s analytical series on inequality among Arctic regions and builds on the assessment of state regional policy instruments. It addresses the need to evaluate whether the current system of tax administration and intergovernmental redistribution performs an equalizing function for Arctic regions and fosters conditions for the accelerated development of lagging territories.

Methods

The analysis is based on open data on tax revenues and their allocation within the budgetary system of the Russian Federation for the period 2013–2023. The study compares indicators at different stages of the budget process to assess how tax administration and redistribution mechanisms affect the scale of interregional inequality in the Arctic Zone. Results are presented through aggregated indicators and comparative charts illustrating changes before and after redistribution.

Results

The findings indicate that Arctic regions play a key role in generating tax revenues, while a considerable portion of these resources is redistributed outside the Arctic. Tax administration mechanisms mitigate disparities between Arctic regions within individual budget years but do not produce a lasting equalizing effect over time. As a result, structural differences in fiscal capacity persist, leading to unequal opportunities for regions to finance their own socioeconomic development programs.

Discussion

A key limitation of the study is the use of aggregated regional data, which prevents the isolation of tax flows generated specifically within Arctic territories or regions that are only partially within the Arctic Zone.

Authors

Maria Zharakhovich
Researcher
Vitovt Kopytok
Researcher

Оthers Our research

Inequality of Arctic Regions. Part I: Fiscal Capacity and Autonomy

This study evaluates disparities in the fiscal capacity of Arctic regions and the extent of their budgetary autonomy.

read more

Index of Sustainable Development and Quality of Life in Small Arctic Settlements

The research focuses on identifying territorial disparities in quality of life, infrastructure provision, access to basic services, and socio-economic opportunities at the level of individual settlements.

read more
View all
arrow-nebutton-svgcaret-downcartclose-annkiclosecopyfacebook-squarehamburgerinstagram-squareleft-arrowlinkedin-squarelinkedinlong-arrow-leftlong-arrow-rightmailminuspagination-arrow-nextpagination-arrow-prevpauseplayplusrutubesearchsharestartelegramtgtriangletwitter-squarevkwhatsapp