Pavel Devyatkin Analyzes Historical Dynamics of the Russia-USA-China Triangle

Photo: BRICS Project Lab Arctic 2.0. PORA

Issues of mutual trust within the Russia–USA–China triangle were raised in a lecture by Pavel Devyatkin, Senior Fellow at The Arctic Institute (USA), Non-resident Fellow at the Quincy Institute (USA), and Visiting Lecturer at HSE University.

Since the 1970s, the ideologues and practitioners of American «realpolitik» have pondered the nature of the relationship between Russia and China: whether the Russia-China partnership is an «alliance of convenience» or whether these relations aspire to be a comprehensive partnership and strategic coordination. This question takes on particular significance in the context of the implementation of Russia’s state policy in the Arctic and key projects in the region, including those with international participation.

On February 26, 2026, a discussion was held at the PORА Expert Center platform on issues of mutual trust within the Russia–USA–China triangle, potential forms and directions for regional cooperation, as well as factors hindering full-fledged work among all interested stakeholders in the Arctic under current conditions. The lecture for participants of the international project laboratory BRICS LAB 2.0 was delivered by Pavel Devyatkin, Senior Fellow at The Arctic Institute (USA), Non-resident Fellow at the Quincy Institute (USA), and Visiting Lecturer at HSE University.

The expert spoke about the dynamics of relations within the strategic Russia–USA–China triangle, which have been characterized by alternating periods of increased and decreased tension since the late 1950s. These dynamics have influenced the security policies, foreign economic priorities, and spheres of influence of states in various regions of the world.

Photo: BRICS Project Lab Arctic 2.0. PORA

«China’s Arctic ambitions are closely tied to its broader foreign policy. The ‘Polar Silk Road’ initiative and the expanding ambition of the Belt and Road into the Far North align with Russia’s efforts to develop commercial navigation along the Northern Sea Route. Chinese investments in Russian Arctic liquefied natural gas projects have been significant, and China has steadily expanded its participation in the Arctic Council as an observer state,» Devyatkin noted.

In a certain sense, Arctic policy serves as a litmus test for current international processes, demonstrating that the idea of «Arctic exceptionalism» has never hindered the pursuit and protection of national interests, including through the buildup of military presence in the region.

According to the expert, the United States has always been a «difficult partner» on the international stage, and the current tariff policies and territorial claims of the sitting US administration could potentially contribute to a rapprochement between Russia and China.

However, «the Russia-China partnership is more complex than it seems,» the expert added.

Objectives related to the development of the Northern Sea Route (NSR) and the Trans-Arctic Transport Corridor could simultaneously create opportunities for expanding bilateral cooperation, but could also expose existing disagreements regarding the status and permissible uses of Arctic maritime corridors. For instance, China interprets the NSR as an international shipping route, while Russia positions it as an internal transport artery and considers it part of its national heritage.

The Project Office for Arctic Development does not always share the opinions expressed by experts.

For media representatives: we welcome republication of comments provided that an active link to the original source and the columnist’s status as an expert of the Arctic Development Project Office are indicated.

Оthers Our comments

Achieving Arctic Development Targets by 2026 — A Foundation for a New Stage of Social and Economic Growth

February 27, 2026 In the run-up to Arctic Day, the Director General of the PORA Expert Center, Maksim Dankin, assessed the results of the social and economic development of the Russian Arctic over the past five years. Speaking at the round table devoted to the strategic priorities for the development of the Russian Arctic Zone...

read more

Trump’s Push for Greenland: Implications for Russia-India Arctic Cooperation

The United States has renewed its focus on Greenland. This desire for acquisition by the US is not unprecedented, having been seriously explored by American policymakers in 1867, 1910, 1946 and 1955. Contrary to initial perceptions that US President Donald Trump's interest was merely frivolous, evidence suggests that this could be a firm decision already made by the US Administration, at least under his leadership, one which they could be determined to execute in future.

read more
View all
arrow-nebutton-svgcaret-downcartclose-annkiclosecopyfacebook-squarehamburgerinstagram-squareleft-arrowlinkedin-squarelinkedinlong-arrow-leftlong-arrow-rightmailminuspagination-arrow-nextpagination-arrow-prevpauseplayplusrssrutubesearchsharestartelegramtgtriangletwitter-squarevkwhatsapp